Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pencemaran Nama Baik di Media Sosial Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik (Pasal 27 Ayat (3) jo. Pasal 45 Ayat (3))

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.68638/jih.v1i3.23

Keywords:

criminal liability, criminal defamation, social media, Electronic Information and Transactions Law (ITE Law), freedom of expression.

Abstract

The rapid development of information and communication technology has significantly transformed the way people interact, particularly through the use of social media as a platform for expressing opinions and sharing information. However, this convenience has also created opportunities for misuse, including the commission of online criminal defamation. This study aims to examine the concept of criminal liability for perpetrators of criminal defamation on social media under Law Number 19 of 2016 concerning Amendments to Law Number 11 of 2008 on Electronic Information and Transactions (ITE Law) and to analyze the legal elements required for the application of such liability.
This research employs a normative legal research method using both the statutory approach and the conceptual approach, supported by an analysis of legal doctrines and relevant court decisions. The legal materials consist of primary legal sources, particularly Article 27 paragraph (3) in conjunction with Article 45 paragraph (3) of the ITE Law, as well as secondary legal materials in the form of legal literature and scholarly journals.
The findings indicate that criminal liability for online defamation requires the fulfillment of both the subjective element, namely intent (dolus), and the objective element, namely the act of distributing, transmitting, and/or making accessible electronic information containing defamatory or insulting content. Furthermore, law enforcement in such cases depends on the existence of a complaint from the victim, as defamation constitutes a complaint-based offense (delik aduan), as well as the use of valid electronic evidence in accordance with applicable procedural law. The study also emphasizes the importance of balancing the protection of individual reputation with the constitutional right to freedom of expression in the digital era to ensure legal certainty, justice, and proportionality in the enforcement of the ITE Law.

References

Republik Indonesia. (2024). Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2024 tentang Perubahan Kedua atas UU ITE.

Republik Indonesia. (2016). Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 tentang Perubahan atas UU No. 11 Tahun 2008 tentang ITE.

Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Putusan terkait uji materi Pasal pencemaran nama baik UU ITE (berbagai putusan relevan 2010–2023).

Republik Indonesia. (2023). Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP Baru).

Republik Indonesia. (2023). Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP).

Moeljatno. (2019). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta. Roeslan Saleh. (2018). Perbuatan Pidana dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana. Jakarta: Aksara Baru.

Lawrence M. Friedman. (2017). Sistem Hukum: Perspektif Ilmu Sosial. Bandung: Nusa Media.

Barus, F. L., dkk. (2023). “Analisis Kasus Pencemaran Nama Baik di Media Sosial.” Protasis: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Budaya.

Pengadilan Negeri Denpasar. Putusan Nomor 828/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Dps (perkara I Gede Ari Astina alias Jerinx SID terkait pencemaran nama baik melalui media sosial berdasarkan UU ITE).

Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. Putusan Nomor 574 K/Pid.Sus/2018 (Kasasi Baiq Nuril Maknun).

Soerjono Soekanto. (2019). Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Published

2026-09-14

How to Cite

Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pencemaran Nama Baik di Media Sosial Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik (Pasal 27 Ayat (3) jo. Pasal 45 Ayat (3)). (2026). Legis Nexus: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 1(3), 431-443. https://doi.org/10.68638/jih.v1i3.23

Similar Articles

11-13 of 13

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.