PATENT CERTIFICATES AS FIDUCIARY ASSETS: A LEGAL REVIEW BASED ON LAW NUMBER 13 OF 2016 AND LAW NUMBER 42 OF 1999

Achmad Dahlan; Basyarudin Basyarudin

Authors

Achmad Dahlan Universitas Terbuka
Basyarudin Basyarudin Universitas Pamulang

Keywords:

Paten, Jaminan Fidusia, Kekayaan Intelektual, Objek Jaminan

Abstract

Amid the transformation toward an innovation-based economy, intellectual property particularly patents plays a vital role as a strategic asset with significant economic value. This article analyzes the legality of using patent certificates as fiduciary collateral within the Indonesian legal system, based on Law No. 13 of 2016 on Patents and Law No. 42 of 1999 on Fiduciary Security. Employing a normative juridical approach, this study explores the legal basis, material and formal requirements, and the legal implications for both patent holders and creditors. The findings indicate that while patent certificates can serve as fiduciary collateral, their implementation faces regulatory and practical challenges, including ambiguities in economic valuation procedures and potential contractual conflicts. Therefore, regulatory reinforcement and institutional understanding are essential for patents to function effectively as financing instruments. This study highlights the importance of recognizing intellectual property as a legitimate collateral object to support innovation-driven economic growth and ensure balanced legal protection

References

Angelina Sidiprasetija, Celia Angelyn Coandi, and D. D. T. (2024). Peningkatan Kompleksitas Dan Volume Dokumen Paten : Promblematika Dalam Perlindungan Paten Di Era Digital. Juris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum, 5(1), 576–581.

Anom Sutrisno. (2025). Peran Hakim Dalam Mewujudkan Due Process of Law Pada. Locus : Jurnal Konsep Ilmu Hukum, 5(1), 17–28.

Boy Ericson Siahaan. (2022). Analisis Yuridis Hak Paten Sebagai Objek Jaminan Fidusia Di Indonesia Dan Sebagai Objek Jaminan Perbankan Di Singapura. Jurnal Ilmu Abdi Ilmu, 14(2), 352–365.

Heddy Kandou, Dhaniswara K Harjono, and A. T. (2021). Jaminan Fidusia Sebagai Jaminan Kebendaan Yang Memberi Hak Mendahulu Dalam Perolehan Pelunasan Utang. To - Ra Jurnal Hukum, 7(2), 132–141.

M. Citra Ramadhan, Fitri Yani Dewi Siregar, and B. F. W. (2023). Textbook of Intellectual Property Rights, ed. Nanang Tomi Sitoris, 1st ed. University of Medan Area Press. https://repositori.uma.ac.id/jspui/bitstream/123456789/19863/1/Buku Ajar HKI.pdf

Martinelli, I. (2023). Regulation of Patent Rights Protection in Indonesia. Qistina: Indonesian Multidisciplinary Journal, 2(2), 978–810.

Mursalin. (2021). Fakultas Hukum Universitas Syiah Kuala Tinjauan Yuridis Hak Paten Sebagai Objek Jaminan Fidusia. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Bidang Hukum Keperdataan, 5(1), 40–47.

Putra Leonardo Sopamena, Merry Tjoanda, and Y. H. (2023). Hak Paten Sebagai Objek Jaminan Fidusia. PATTIMURA Law Study Review, 1(1), 92–101.

Sibri, L. (2024). Upaya Kepolisian Dalam Mengamankan Pelaksanaan Jaminan Fidusia Berdasarkan Peraturan Kepala Kepolisian Nomor 8 Tahun 2011. Binamulia Hukum, 13(1), 249–261. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37893/jbh.v13i1.785.

Subagiyo, D. T. (2018). Hukum Jaminan Dalam Perspektif Undang-Undang Jaminan Fidusia (Suatu Pengantar),. UWKS Press. https://erepository.uwks.ac.id/5195/1/Buku Jaminan Fidusia_Dwi Tatak Subagiyo_ISBN.pdf

Supriyadi. (2020). Hukum Perkreditan Dan Penyelesaiannya (Telaah Penyelesaian Secara Non Litigasi). Qahar Publisher. http://repository.iainkudus.ac.id/6180/1/NASKAH Buku Dr. Supriyadi%2C S.H.%2C M.H.pdf

Syahputra, A. (2012). Hukum Perdata Indonesia Jilid 2. Citrapustaka Media Perintis. http://repository.uinsu.ac.id/8215/1/Hukum Perdata Indonesia Jilid 2.pdf